>>52347316>It's not exactly relevant to the conversation so no I'm not.A series using one type of time travel is very relevant to the use of it elsewhere.
>but the fact of the matter is you thought I was talking about legitimate fossils that you could find in game and you can't revise that because anyone can scroll up.You're a dumbass. The entire point behind calling them living fossils is that they haven't adapted in the millions of years the species has been alive. Revive a Relicanth fossil, catch a wild Relicanth, and bring one from the past. They will all be the same Pokemon. Which is what you're arguing the pastmons could be, which wouldn't be true since they're labeled as paradoxes. If Flutter Mane, a Paradox Pokemon, is a living fossil, then why isn't Relicanth a Paradox Pokemon too?
>Of course you'd believe in that nonsense theory.Oh god you're one of those people.
>Which is far from the case mind youYou haven't made a case against that claim. I'm not a mind reader. You have to use your words to not sound like an idiot with a rudimentary understanding of the concept of temporal paradoxes.
>Once more there's a clear origin point but you don't seem to understand that the origin event created the tools for its own creation.Explain to me where the Game Boy came from then. You haven't answered any of my questions, and I honestly don't expect you to. I don't think you CAN.
