>>47803554Technically speaking that's Dendrophilia, and there's no real following of it big enough to actually warrant a group name like "furry". That being said, it is important to separate non-thinking, rooted plants with such different biology that they're incomparable to animals to sentient animal-plant hybrid things that are grouped into the Pokemon "Fictional Animals" wildlife as a whole. There are non-sentient plants in the Pokemon Universe, such as berry trees or flowers, and there are the animals or creatures like, say, Roserade.
All things considered, Pokemon, all of them, ARE fictional animals. So, yes. If you're sexually attracted to Lilligant you're still kind of a furry. Granted, Lilligant I feel is significantly more human-like than Garde, and it's definitely a plant primarily, but in the context of Pokemon's "they're all fictional animals and we have non-sentient plants" it falls into the category. If you want to have sex with the Berry Tree you pick your Sitrus Berries from, THEN you wouldn't be a Furry. You'd still be weird, though.
Unless you're trying to fuck Phantump or Trevenant, because then you're a god damn Pedophile, and I think we can all agree Pedophiles should be burned at the stake.>>47803632>continues to cope>>47803727>el retardo can't fathom how people view him as degenerate, so he exaggerates what the opposition feels and says so that they look worseLike pottery
I'm not ninetails fag either, surprising though it may be to you the majority of people will agree that wanting to fuck fictional animals is gross and wrong.
