>>47302891i'll try to be more succinct (and fail obviously)
>>With the context of your prior statement>prove its my statementi obviously failed to get across what i meant with this. what i mean is claiming context (what he said was X, but what he really meant was Y) gives you carte blanche to rewrite my entire statement to how it suits you and then you can argue against that instead of my statement. by attempting to take the joke post as serious and relevant to the argument, you are doing as such.
>that _looks like_ cropped porn you are asserting its cropped porn, regardless of whether it is or not is irrelevant, you are framing this the way you wish it to be:
>filename being _cringeworthy_ master-fetishagain you are framing the context;
>implies that _you_ think feelings=smutyou can't possibly know what i think, you are presuming i'm thinking that way. regardless of whether i do or not, nothing i've said actually supports this you just presume it does. you may or may not be correct, but to me you have failed to properly bridge that gap, hence, jumping to conclusions
>Only a coomer _who's brain is melted by porn_ drawing a conclusion based on your own version of what i've said
regardless, all this has done is
make me lament that my recent excursion into university has taken away all love i had for writing and now all i seem to be capable of is arguing with people. and i'm not even very good at that. i look past on some of my older work and i'm surprised i ever wrote it. i suppose me being called a coombrain, despite me pretending to be one, just made me miss the days when i could churn out thousands of words at a time guided by muh dick, so i lash out in the only way i know how to, whatever all this garbage isi'm done btw. while no satisfactory conclusion was met, i'm quitting. you win, no sarcasm intended. enjoy this off model gardevoir.
