>>36341573What haven't you been able to understand about my post?, fuck off with your "muh golden age" and "muh ebul genwunners wit deir design misojonee".
I shall explain to you the rules of argumentation:
An argument, objective statement or claim is only valid when it either has 1. Facts, evidence or hints backing that up 2. Logic and sometimes moral as part of its argumentation 3. Examples to showcase its validity.
You just took your opinion and tried to sell it as a fact.
That the way Pokemon worked and appeared severely changed after Gen 3 is obvious, that not all changes were good, if you played the games, looked at them and compared them, noticed how they feel and work, you would have noticed that over the course of three generations many basic tools(bag, PC etc.) were imrpoved for the player, while some functions were replaced or reduced nonetheless, which are mostly positive though, for example that Fire does not have a weakness against Ice anymoe since Gen 2 or that new types were added to balance the game and even new mechanics, like the berries, came, is also clear.
What makes my post different from yours or that of others like
>>36341613>>36341627is that I'm actually trying to make a point and offer a conclusion and even a solution, while you are trying to spread your subjective opinion faggotry.
What you are doing is expressing your emotions and packing them into a post.
The only thing that your post could achieve is convince me of your opinion, but it is too poorly made and presents your viewpoint in such an angle that it is not going to be able to do that.
So the only thing you're doing is pushing your goals, giving your sentiments words and taking my time.
I'm not interested in generation faggotry, I do not have any enemies in here, I solely want to give an option and express a point and you come by and intellectually shit on my lawn and have butthurt, salt and cringe.
