>>55787176It's hilarious how much the lack of gender symbol next to these mons' names pisses off braindead trannies here. When it makes perfect sense to me lore wise, and makes me appreciate the thought that went into them that much more. Except for those repulsive "paradox" mons. Mistakes they were indeed. Those disgusting shits do not even belong in the same picture with my beloved gen 5-7 legendaries. Do not misinterpret me, however - I have no qualms with gendered legendaries, when it makes sense, as it does in the case of latios/latias/cresselia/genies. But asserting that the classic 5-7 beauties in the OP were not given a gender symbol next to their name because of a "lack of caring" shows you don't understand fucking anything about pokemon.
>>55787274Yes, it is based on a deer (as opposed to a buck). Terrakion is based on a bull (as opposed to a cow). That doesn't mean it should have a gender symbol next to its name. All of them (including keldeo) are based on the 3 musketeers who are men. There is depth and creativity behind them, and gender unknown is fitting. If you want to believe it's a girl, go ahead, but please don't fucking demand a fucking gender symbol next to its name. It isn't a latias or a cresselia. It's a virizion, it's different. And ash had a female voice actor too.