>>35908981I dunno, you seem retarded enough to deny all the facts here and still cry out that BW1 was a flop despite it preforming at a pretty good number.
And going by your logic, RS was a flop because it sold less than DP
XY was clearly a flop because it sold a bit less than DP
SM was clearly a flop because it sold less than DP
Do you realize how stupid you sound?