>>49039803>With Megas it introduced more new Pokemon than gen 2.Megas aren’t new Pokémon
>This is bad how again?Whether it’s bad is subjective, but it demonstrates lack of faith in new Pokémon
>Yeah, I hate it how every Zelda game panders to Link. They had no faith in BOTW by having Link and Ganon show up again.>Being THIS disingenuous Just another day of interacting with kalosfags. Business as usual. Anyway, concession accepted but also
>Also if we’re using your clown standard of “old pokemon = bad”, then you’re admitting Emerald, FRLG, HGSS, Platinum, BW2 are all bad. Again this discussion isn’t about whether it’s bad, it’s about whether is displays a lack of faith in the new Pokémon to carry the games appeal, rather than relying on old Pokémon to bring in nostalgia bucks. But even if it were
>Implying third versions and remakes have as much obligation to bring in new Pokémon as the original games of each gen >What is a new generation vs a remake or a definition versionI kekked. Kalosfags are truly as pathetic as they say.
>GS and DP are also terrible by your clown standard since they also both spam old Pokemon everywhere.Not as much as XY but yes I actually do think that these 2 games rely too heavily on old Pokémon. There’s a debate to be had about the creative intentions in GS case, but DP sucked in this regard. Still, more than half the dex consists of new Pokémon so it doesn’t even approach XY where less than 1/6 of the dex consists of new Pokémon.
Anyway that’s all the (you)s for (you) your pathetic attempts at “””points””” have basically proven themselves wrong with how ridiculous they are. You oughta stretch before performing such gymnastics
