>>41998582That is the full version friend, it was delivered in a past phox phriday about 2 and a half years ago.
>>41998630>>41998649Let me try to reason with your reasoning:
You see it as
A: Fetish and B: Furry.
Fetish because it is a picture of a Braixen looking down at the viewer and waving, which can be interpreted to size difference, or dominance play. However; this is because you simply see it as such. It is simply a picture of a Braixen waving.
B: You see it as furry because it is a Fox humanoid. This is not furry, this is a Pokemon, and it is on model. You could use the arguement if she had humanoid breasts, or there was emphasis on thighs/butt, etc, however there is none to be had.
It cannot be C, because there are no visible genitals, nor are there visible nipples.
It is simply, an model picture of a Braixen waving. So the answer, is ultimately E, none of the above.
You are the ones with the dirty minds reading into it that it is something more than it really is, you attack it because you simply do not like it, or because you are a puritan. To the latter, why are you on 4chan to begin with? As to the former, it is most likely, you do not like something, so you read into it, and likewise attack it, despite it not breaking any rule whatsoever.
This line of thinking was specifically on why the Grey Line was introduced, and why Climate Control was put into play.
Now, if I had posted along the image "Hey there little man" "Oh no, Giant Braixen!" or "Your such a paw sult master" then you could use the arguements as you stated, however, all I did was post a picture of a Pokemon waving, on /vp/ a board for Pokemon.
Are you saying that I cannot post Pokemon, on /vp/?
>>41998591This is fetish.
