>>53022597I'm done with you, you keep going back to the same argument and there is no point trying to tell you what the protag being a literal child would do in the case of an unreliable narrator
I don't know how you can keep completely glossing over the fact that the protags are literal children embellishing events. You keep ignoring that what we SEE happen is not necessarily what is ACTUALLY happening, with your reasoning being "BUT WE SEE IT HAPPENING"
You are a retard and my new theory is that Pokemon stories are made for your level of reading comprehension, goodbye.
