>>38872353Got a problem with Ghosts,buddy? What are you, an Icefag?
>>38872349If we have 100, there's a higher chance of there being 40-50 good ones as opposed to deluding yourself into thinking that they'll make a low number of pokemon and ALL will be good.
Give me 100, and I'll be happy if 30 are viable. Give me 70 and I'm sure 90% will be shitmons.
>>38872361Considering the new Champion seems to have a Charizard, I don't doubt that Gigantomax Charizard will be a thing.
