>>39103174>You mean Will-O-Wisp? Sorry, I was talking about Hitodama and Aoandon.Hitodama *is* a Will-O-Wisp.
Aoandon is represented as a woman. So what you have is a Will-O--Wisp in its stead, and it is not drawn to lamps but is itself a lamp.
>Come on, it's so easy to google.Yeah, and yet you act as if I'm not right.
>I'm really beginning to question your grasp on Japanese culture. I shouldn't have to explain this to you.They are just objects, in their design. There's almost nothing in their lore which points to Aoandon besides the embodiment of lamps.
>The fact that you ignored Psyduck's simple designI didn't, I just didn't bother thoroughly responding to you. You want to jump on every instance of silence as if its a concession, when that is not the case at all.
I let your words speak for themselves and let anyone who's reading judge for themselves. I'm confident they'll find you lacking.
>I will acknowledge that Litwick has a simple design like many pokemon, new and old - but you've failed to demonstrate why this is unique to Gen V or why it automatically ruins the design.This is again a trend which is particular to Unova that generations prior to it did not exhibit. A trend means most Pokemon adhere to it. Naturally, there will be outliers. Psyduck is an outlier of Kanto's trend toward detail.
>I will go ahead and point out that the reason Litwick looks so much like a candle is because that's the fucking point, retard.Of course it is. Doesn't make it exceptional as a design, however.
>it looks less and less like its object as it evolvesNo, they all remain clearly recognizable as what they're based on.
>You were defending Gen 6, right?I placed Kalos below Unova. See my second post ITT. And as I say, they share the same trend.
You want a good ghost? Frillish line. That's really good in my opinion.
