>>12943461>it was an incredibly obvious fake.No it wasn't.
I remember people using the same shitty "b-but the gen 5 starter leak!" with the fakes in the picture and
>>12940321, and look what happened. One questionable leak with an actual source coming true doesn't mean we should be blind idiots when there's no source, the art of the Pokemon is off, and the art of the magazine is off.
