>>12656905>That's the key word. Resemble pokemon. But how perfect pokemon look like? Is there any example? Any recipe?I don't think there's any real dead set rule in regards to it. Pokemon as a whole is chock full of variety as you can take pretty much any concept and go with it.
The biggest trait as to defining a Pokemon design, I think, is that for the most part, the a Pokemon's design is generally simplistic. Even the most complex Pokemon could be considered simplistic in a way. Though, perhaps a better word would Colorization and design can often matter in what can make or break a Pokemon.
Something like this >>No.12650070 doesn't really have a Pokemon feel to it as is. However, it is possible to modify it in ways to make it look more 'Pokemon-ish'. Making the colors a little more vibrant, making its details a little more cartoony instead of so busy, and a few other things.
You can have patterns, items and 'humanization' with Pokemon as long as it doesn't get too out of control and 'busy'.
>>12649989 >>12649998 >>12650005 and
>>12650026 are examples of the opposite. Taking Pokemon and making them way more complex in appearance and taking away the Pokemon 'feel'
In the long run, it ends up completely subjective, because everybody has different tastes and opinions that can get in the way of things. Saying
>>12648228 is 'bad' doesn't necessarily mean it is. It has the coloring and general simplicity/cartoonishness of a Pokemon.
