>>52048296Yeah?
That says absolutely NOTHING about the Corvinknight itself being in dange, but obviouly it's safe to assume it is.
What kind of logic leap is going from "the Pokemon's natual predators will attack it while it flies, endangering the customer" to "Corviknight is in no danger, only customer is".
>>52048350>doesn't say if it's successful or notThey do have metal hammers.
