>>53798545what about a capitalist who willingly pays a teacher and a teacher who willingly obliges? what about a socialist government we willing pay taxes to that willingly provides us with services, like education?
That teacher student dynamic is transactional. Capitalist society can account for this.
Do you want no money to be exchanged? The teacher would have to use his time and skills altruistically and teach the student out of the goodness of his heart or obligation to his community.
But lets say he chooses not to pass on his skills to the next generation, which is within in his rights as a free, anarchist man. But then the next generation might starve or their machines might stop working etc. because the machinists and farmers had no incentive to teach them. The group/collective would have no safety net. So the community would force the teacher to work, for the good of all. Whether he liked it or not. thats communism, comrade. the community would use a power dynamic to take away someones free will. power dynamics will form in your utopia is what i'm saying. Anarchist Utopia is an oxymoron.
>>53798545>not if that one tough guy has to stand up to a fight against the entire collective simultaneously Assume the tough guy isnt a total un-charismatic retard and thus isn't alone. A thug could easily gain majority support. The simultaneous collective hoard cannot be relied upon to back the heroes and free-thinking friends of the anarcho-revolution to keep oppression at bay. They are retarded normies and they will willingly subjugate themselves to Supreme Leader UngaBunga Gorilla Dick immediately so long as it guarantees their short-term safety.
I've seen the cowardice of man and woman. they will follow the herd and the herd follows a tyrant. Even if your anarcho community had NO HIERARCHIES written in stone in town square as their one golden rule, I bet they'd form. The Roman Republic had SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS and they still fell to tyranny.
