>>53798456if we are naturally cooperative then why be anarchists? I don't follow
Unless we aren't using the term anarchism the same way. to me, it is non-societal. a true anarchist would be completely alone.
If you say society can exist without government, I disagree. non-government means no hierarchies. A teacher to a student is a hierarchy. A father to his children is a hierarchy. hierarchy happens naturally due to competence. My point is, if we all moved into a cave and stopped paying taxes, cave-topia, some sort of wiseman or tough guy would start calling the shots in less than 48 hours. in 48 years, you'd have a country with a government so we're back at square 1.
Describe your ideal world where millions of Americans, or whatever country, somehow survive a transition to anarchy without a massive culling of the population.
I too believe we are cooperative and thats why I put forward National Socialism as an alternative. Best of both communism and capitalism or worst of both?
>if, in your eyes, my demeanor changes my message in any way shape or form, then that's your problem, not mine. bro you immediately started calling names and talking about me getting my peepee snipped. I have a massive tolerance for conspiracy talk and GOY GOY GOY but you will not make it far on /vp/ with that caustic babble. Your bitterness and isolation is only hurting you
>>53798496I agree with you that a close family/community is more inclined to help eachother than people with no relation. How do you answer the question of what to do with the millions of people in our society without a great culling? and even if your anarcho/civilization thrives, how will you convince china to cull their population? because if they don't then you won't be able to compete with them and theyll stomp you.
you understand the need for nationalism/race because you understand the strength of community and family.
>>53798499If you hate jews so much why not natsoc?
