>>40988854I agree. That is why I remain an abstaining lolicon; not acting on my desires, because I acknowledge it would result in psychological trauma for the girl in question. But I will never lie to myself claiming that women can come even close to competing with prepubescent girls in the realm of eroticism.
What makes me scratch my head is why so many people both in online communities and irl like to shame pedophiles for being "incels". In this very thread we have a perfect example:
>>40988491 You would think these people would prefer for pedos to keep it in their pants instead of constantly implying or outright stating they should "have sex". Think of it from the perspective of a straight man. If society told you it was illegal to have sex with women even if she consented, but constantly suggested for you to fuck a man as a way to cope, would you go through with it? I'd imagine most guys would not since they are simply not sexually attracted to men, or perhaps even repulsed by them. This exact same logic applies to lolicons/pedos. I am NOT asking for rights to fuck children, merely for some consideration and empathy of what the law-abiding pedos are going through on a daily basis. Being a straight male pedophile in today's society is living life on Very Hard mode.
