>>47855088>Story in a Pokemon game doesn't need to be anything beyond "go challenge the gyms and be the champion". Yes it does, retard.
>Subjective and buzzword. I for one think 90% of the "good" Pokemon in gen 2 are evolutions of Kanto Pokemon to begin with.You're an idiot, save your taste because you don't have a lot of it and it doesn't look like more is coming in.
>Except for every Kanto starter, both Kanto fossils, and every Kanto legendary, the gang's all here.The absence of these things emphasizes GSC's nature as a sequel. Besides, they would have been more readily obtainable at the time of the game's release, given its compatibility with RBY. That said, all those things are present in the remakes. It's Hoenn and Sinnoh Pokemon that are more difficult to get ahold of in those games, but there are features incorporated to accommodate for that, like the Pal Park in Fuschia City.
>Iterations. Again, you mean gen 4 so you're counting RSE and DPPt. In gen 2 it's literally the same team as the previous iteration with the same overall goal, to steal Pokemon. Only now their boss is gone and they need him back for direction. "We're thieves" is hardly more interesting. It's perfect, simple, and the best evil team, but propping them up as a brilliant idea is nonsense.Finally a good point.
>Another lie. they made 3. One for Gold, one for Silver, and a back sprite shared between them. Crystal takes one of the two from Gold or Silver and animates it, the base static sprite is not new aside from color changes in a few.At least you finished up strong.
>>47853886I said it before and I'll say it again, stop posting this garbage. Nobody hates GSC.
