>>55374598Fine
>>553728546/10
Respectable. There are some questionable higher tiers, like Mothim or Rabsca, but nothing is exceedingly out of place. It gets by with doing less than the full list, making it harder to judge
>>553729028/10
Excellent consistency, with a very solid S tier. Even if I'm sad to see some of my favorites in C tier, such refinement in S and A tier makes this list stand out.
>>553730305/10
This is pretty much what I'd expect from a reddit poll. Scizor line / Volcaronas / Heracross as the top tiers, Gen 3 lumped together, Gen 1 lumped together. It's the most bog-standard list you can get.
>>553730757/10
While a bit muddy in the top tiers, an extremely well refined F and D tier makes this list stronger than it looks at first impression. Those truly are the bottom 10 bugs, and well separated from the two tiers.
>>553730974/10
Not doing any evolutions makes it easier to read, but some truly bad bugs reaching high tier (Wormadam, Araquanid, Scorpi) makes it a mid at best.
>>553731201/10
Too top heavy to really gleam any information. With only 7 mons in a "not-positive" tier, this list at most tells me a top 12 and nothing else.
>>553731806/10
A bit too "here's the entire line in a row" for my tastes, but some truly unappreciated bugs reaching top tiers is a good sight to see.
>>553732482/10
Bad tastes all round. Orbeetle top, Shuckle, Yanmega, and Ribombee at the bottom, Pheromosa reaching A tier, Scizor in C tier. Only redeeming quality is Paras/Parasect reaching 2nd place. More credit than Mr. "All bugs are good bugs :)", but not by much.
>>553732658/10
Even as a bug fan, I can respect a bug hater filtering out the good ones. Heracross, Shedninja, Joltic, and Volcarona is an excellent line up for the top 5, and many solid runner ups hitting A and B Tier works well. Sure, Accelgor or Pheromosa is a bit high, but look at this list more of "which ones escape F tier".
Hit text limit. Will do more if interest is there.
