>>35312880So now the argument is based on the artist's intention? Then if I say Lopunny was "meant to resemble a rabbit" and someone is attracted to Lopunny (hence, attracted to the qualities of a rabbit), that means he is also attracted to real-life rabbits? I already said that people are attracted to certain neotenous traits; this is factual of virtually all humans and wholly irrelevant as to whether one is attracted to the juvenile which these traits resemble.
Maybe the question we should all be asking is what is a loli in the first place? because I don't think we're talking about the same thing. I see "loli" as describing an archetypal female human design commonly found in Japanese manga in which the character appears youthful, short, thin, usually with small breasts, and large eyes. I would count pic related as a loli. And the people I know who share these traits have no hormonal problem; it's simply genetics. My brother looked like he was 16 until he was 25. This isn't a rare phenomenon, dude. Could you lay out your whole argument so I can understand your points and conclusion? You're not the other guy, I'm assuming.