>>12094069Let's go step by step into breaking down your buttfrustration.
>just because it got good sales for a videogame in GENERAL, doesn't mean it's good FOR Pokemon. Care to explain why?
> Yes it sold more than most games in other franchises, but MOST franchises don't have remakes, either, only a select few get those when they are exceedingly popular with a long-term fanbaseThat has nothing to do with why it would be bad for Pokemon. What does other franchises not having remakes have to do with anything?
>And even if R/S qualify to be one of those few gameswait, what would make if qualify? you didnt mention any criteria it had to meet.
>it's still not a simple question of "would this make money." Of course it would make money.Then what the fuck is the problem?
>but the question is would it make MORE money than spending the same time and effort on original titles?Well, remakes have a story and characters already made. That would definitely cut the time down to produce a game significantly. We got HS/SS in between platinum and black/white and everything worked out great.
You are fucking dumb.
