>>58004667Why are you twisting my words? Maybe because you know you're wrong?
I confirm that there's a translation error, but what I'm explaining is that even if I take your point of view that there's no error, it doesn't change the fact that it makes no sense scripturally to give more credit to the professor than to the AI on the subject of Paradoxmon.
The professor we meet at Crystal Pool is surprised to see our lizard. It's the first time he's seen a Paradoxmon, so he hasn't named Miraidon/Koraidon (as he calls them by their Paradox names found in the Scarlet/Violet Book), so he hasn't been able to do any genetic or behavioural analysis on Paradoxmon (something the AI has done because it mentions it in the main story).
We also know that the time machine is unfinished and untested for this version of the professor in the Crystal Pool (where the AI clearly explain us the limits of the machine and has filled Aera Zero with Paradoxmon).
He needs the White Book to advance his research, because he's stuck. White Book, which contains precious data on Terapagos and the Terastal phenomenon.
That's called logic, unless you consider that the characters don't evolve over time? The very principle of scientific research is to experiment, observe, analyse and see whether or not hypotheses are invalidated. It's about developing knowledge; between before and after a study, you develop new knowledge that you've been able to verify.
