>>55961848OP only mentioned people, not the qualities of gens. That rightfully warned post was converting the thread into a genwar thread.
>>55961834>every game past gen 1had basics like pokeballs and trainers, yes. XY relied on Kanto specific content way too much.
>performanceGen 4 didn't crash like 6, and mu speed is fake complaints for attention span gutted zoomers
>subjectiveThere's a ay to quantify it though.
>friends already existedAnd they're noticeably shittier in XY
>>55961878>You in particular forgettingMost people forgetting it is a symptom that it's not good enough to be remembered. Stills waiting on you to address the actual criticism.
>Give a sourceBrowse the internet.
>It offers so little satisfaction that most people forget itis a good point, yes. Still waiting on you to address the actual criticism.
>Stop conflating memorability with memorabilityYou in particular remembering it means it's remembered by you. It being very easy to forget (due to bad characters, plot, among others), causing most people to not remember it, means it's not memorable. Still waiting on you to address the actual criticism.
>There is no strawmanAnyone who can scroll up and read can point to your exact strawman anon. You're not fooling anyone. Any argument can be straw manned no matter how good it is, and you being able to strawman it doesn't make it bad. You're just a retard who can't actually argue the point at hand, so you have to completely change it to pretend you're opponent's dumber than you. But we al know that's a very hard attribute to attain.
>muh ad populumIt's just a symptom anon. You're not addressing the actual criticism, which stems from not having as many qualities about them that make them worth remembering. Fewer people actually remember it because the quality of the characters and the plot, among other things, is so low it isn't worth remembering it.
>you can't critique the gameOnly because you EXPLICITLY refuse to refute them.