>>35382805>opinionatedAs opposed to you? Guess you're one of those who seriously believe his opinions are "facts".
This a conversation with discerning voices, of course it's going to be "opinionated". It's stupid and redundant to point it out.
>Obviously whatever image I posted is shit either way in your eyesNo, that image was shit. Can you seriously defend the Arbok, and Volcarona comparisons?
Ferrothorn? Fucking Chandelure?
That pic is practically a parody of people like you.
>And you quickly jumped to use that "bottom" part post as the starting point of your attack. You didn't even bother correcting him.>your attack>starting pointHoly shit, talk about having victim complex.
>Do you really expect me to believe you're intention here is to not to make Unova look good? "Do you really expect me to believe your intention is to not make Unova look bad?"
See? See how little sense saying this to someone with a different opinion does?
>so no shit Pokemon based on the same species are comparableIf being based on the same species is the only thing that it takes for it to be called a "rehash", then not only a pokemon being a rehash isn't bad, but it can't be an indicator of "lack of creativity" either. Not to mention that every generation is filled with dozens of "rehashes", so it doesn't make sense to criticize gen5 for it.
>trying to have a serious conversation Do you seriously believe that's what you're doing? Having a "serious" conversation?
Because every single one of your posts is filled with random insults and projections towards anyone who disagree with you. And the funniest thing is that you're the only one posting like this in the thread.
You're incredibly immature.
