>>35382313First of all, if we count all of your cases, it's about 35% of the Unova dex, which is a third, not "more than half", so not so bad already.
Second, most of them need extreme reaching.
>purrloinYou realize that's the fifth cat in the franchise, right?
>munna>tell me why two sets of psychic tapirs with dream powershypnosis =/= dream
And their stats are completely different.
>swoobat>jellicent>excadrillHave always been retarded examples. What, just because an animal were used once, it means those animals can never be touched again with different takes? Apart from the animal they were based in, they objectively have nothing in common with the other bat, jellyfish and mole.
Do you even realize how many pokemon would have to be eliminated from the entire franchise if repeating an animal family is not allowed? It's ridiculous.
>throh, sawkTwo humanoid fighting types? Seriously? Do you know how many of those we've had through the franchise?
Statwise they couldn't work more different to their counterparts.
>crustleCompletely different theme, design path, and stat build.
Again another one whose only sin was repeating an already used animal (hermit crab).
>klinklangGen1 alone had 3 lines that evolve by sticking together with more individuals
But I guess we should never use this design method ever again, because it was used in gen1.
I guess this means Barbaracle is also a rehash, huh?
>braviary, bouffalantMore of the "an animal family can only be used once in the entire franchise" stupidity.
>shit that happens in every region are rehashes>the pseudo is a rehash because gen1 had a pseudo>Scolipede, the first scolopendra in the franchise, is a rehash because it has chrysalis middle formAs I said, extreme reaching.
>monkeys trying to be eevee With a different gimmick that whose only similarity is that it is related to typing?
