>>15869087Nothing in the 3DS's architecture allows for the kind of modification you are suggesting mandating such updates within a game or over local play.
Worst case scenario, the person is able to make every box they own full of hacked mons, then they update, then they can go online.
You have offered no explanation of how an update increasing the level of complexity of the code check would do anything to allow legitimately made pokemon through while blocking the hacked ones simultaneously. If you are suggesting security checks that would make the hacked mons pass initially but fail after the update, that would work- once. Then they would be free to make indistinguishable ones on the next tier of firmware, in time.
The best you can hope for is a perpetual game of cat-and-mouse over the life of the system. For the console's general security, this is advisable and financially smart. In terms of X and Y, It isn't because it's a single game with free online and the cost to yield you are suggesting is far too steep for gamefreak.
What you are suggesting is technically possible but as unrealistic as you are saying the eventual cracks are. Except that unlike you alone being a voice arguing that NINTENDO SECURITY STRONK, everyone else is telling you that you're wrong.
>>15869197>Good enough for meWhich is still plenty. Any pokemon ability/moveset your game's "mutation" would naturally allow would be legitimate for a hacked pokemon to have. And your imaginary key system would eventually be cracked to match.
