>>17908814>Would you class the people who derail threads as "faggots"?Yes, because they are not capable of keeping their matters of sexuality where it hasn't been called for.
>Or the people that bring politics into the discussion and then yell /pol/ when people tell them to shut up "faggots"?Yes
>How about the gaylords that have a victim complex and get up in arms about everything?That's pretty much the best definition for a faggot
>Or the shitstains that spam gay porn/g-fur and go on about their "husbandos"?Again, yes.
>Or how about the cancerous tumblrites that post images with tumblr filenames, spam emoticons, and generally act like the most obnoxious shitlickers known to man?Explain how this applies only to gay people and not just an obnoxious Tumblrite.
>Because pretty much every gay person on 4chan does at least one of thoseI like how you think completely over the top generalizations are perfectly valid for your argument.
It looks to me like you just want to find something wrong with gay people instead of objectively seeing who the obnoxious people are and who aren't.
It's like if I right now started every woman on the planet because there's feminists out there who act like completely obnoxious people who want to spread their cancerous mindset onto society.
