>>21696766Gen 1 started the game, so you only had those 151 to catch and like... they all looked more impressive because pokemon was something new, and there were fewer.
Then came gen 2 and 3 and so on, and on every gen there would be some cool dudes, but some nostalgiafags would compare the shittiest looking ones to the, so you onl y had those 151 to catch and like... they all looked more impressive because pokemon was something new, and there were fewer.Then came gen 2 and 3 and so on. They had good and bad designs, change and throwbacks to older pokemon. The thing is, nostalgiafags would look at new pokemon and remember only their favorites from older gens... they would compare every single pokemon from a gen to their prized charizard, or bitching tyranitar. Then they would start talking about how gen 1 is better because of the shitty pokemon in newer gens, forgetting gen1 had shitty things too. This created a backlash where babbies started using the buzzword "genwun" to describe everyone who likes earlier designs, be they obnoxious nostalgiafags or just people who liked it when gen 2 MC didn't look like some teen model.
I like all gens... 1 gave me blastoise and venusaur, 2 gave me tyranitar and typhlosion, 3 gave me blaziken(which i didn't like at first) and zigzagoon, 4 gave me garchomp and rhyperior, 5 gave me haxorus and zebstraika, and 6 gave me greninja and yveltal. I do like gen 1 and 2's washed out art styles better.
