>>22518805>>22520941Okay, I'll admit that I was kinda out-of-line with my criticism and I apologize for that. I personally believe that it's stupid to portray Gardevoir in such a not-Gardevoir way, but it's occurred to me that it's equally stupid to bash random people on the internet for having different tastes in Gardevoir styles. I went ahead and edited the picture for you.
However, keep in mind that I didn't assume anything about anyone else's opinions on art, nor do I believe that people are exclusively here to read about my opinions on a fictional character. I'm simply stating my opinion on something (albeit strongly), and there's no reason for anyone to get assblasted about it. I'm fine with Gardevoir having boobs as long as the artist doesn't go overboard with it.
>>22521505I understand what you mean. Even in real life, my tendency to overstate my opinions on certain things has gotten me in trouble a few times, so I oughta keep myself in check. Although I strongly believe that the best way to portray Gardevoir is as her usual self, I get why people would like emphasizing certain 'features' in their art. She may be fictional, but she means a lot to me.
Having got that out of the way, anyone want something edited?
