There are a couple generations where I could've thought of a pokemon that I like better than the starters, but I added the starters in anyway. I'll try to fit as many in-depth rates as possible.
>>2313956510/12, good taste. Not a huge fan of some of the pokemon that you like in gens 6 and 1, but overall good taste.
>>231394977/12, decent taste. There are some pokemon in there whose designs I'm not a huge fan of, but there are a lot of good ones too.
>>231371745/12, not a huge fan of a lot of those.
>>231365939/12, good taste. There are a lot of really great pokemon included in there, glad to see some love for purugly.
>>231365298/12, above decent taste. Your taste in gen 5 pokemon is perfect, I love it. Gen 6, not so much.
>>231360306/12, eh. There are a few pretty great pokemon in there, but there are also some that kind of bother me. Gen 2 taste is solid though, three of those were bros for me in Crystal.
>>231356016/10, eh. Your taste in gen 1 pokemon really bothers me, but you have good taste when it comes to gens 2 and 4.
>>231348249/12, good taste. I've been seeing a lot of people with great taste in gen 5 pokemon, you're no exception.
>>231341016/12, eh. Should've put more in gen 6, there were a lot of good pokemon in that gen.
>>231336865/12, not a huge fan of a lot of those. Gens 3 and 4 are solid though.
>>231334568/12, good taste. Especially good taste in gen 4 'mons.
>>231332967/12, eh. Great taste in gens 2 and 5.
