>>24831709>a few generalsA constant thread up isn't "a few", and having threads up consistently will drain the threads of any content that could be posted really fast.
If there was no OC, they would die off stupidly fast.
That is why thread moderation is and was the solution.
>a bit of etiquetteDo you really think killing off the type of thread you is etiquette?
Not only that, but the people who post in these threads have previously shown the self moderation to actually pull off weekly threads!
How is a constant general that drains any interest in these threads BETTER than a moderated schedule that is good for the longevity of the threads?
>occasional threads wrecked by infighting and trollsThe occasional threads we used to have were filled with no more trolls than these generals have been.
If anything, the spam of generals has only brought on more shitposting and trolls.
People care less about ruining Gardevoir threads when there are less Gardevoir threads.
>90% of /vp/ are maymay/shitpost threads anywayI agree with you, it's not like this board will be any worse by having a Gardevoir general.
The problem is that the over saturation of the threads will directly harm the Gardevoir threads themselves.
There will be no art to post, nothing to discuss, and no OC to keep them alive.
They will die quickly after posting, and anyone who enjoyed these threads will get bored of them and leave.
You'll be left alone trying to make a dead thread no one will post in.
I said it before and I'll say it again, if it wasn't for SMD coming here and doing OC, these threads would have burnt out.
If you truly like Gardevoir threads, and want to keep having them on this board, why do you insist on running them into the ground?
Do you really think, despite every flaw I've pointed out now and previously, that this general is a good idea?
