/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #28984501

>>28984527
It literally and completely did. You can MMMUH BUT ITS NOT CANON all you want, but the 3 dead pokemon clearly had nothing to do with Eevee.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:28:33 No.28985352 Report

Quoted By: >>28985392 >>28985665

>>28984545
>>28985327
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rga9wUdKRk8

The silhouettes of the pre-Ho-Oh legendary beasts look nothing like an Eeveelution. Honestly looks more like Houndour.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:29:05 No.28985359 Report

Quoted By: >>28985417

>>28985337
But it's not canon, you fucking retard. Learn what Canon means dipshit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1465154257074.png, 474KiB, 1440x1437

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:29:35 No.28985366 Report

Quoted By: >>28985417 >>28985842 >>28985878 >>28987692

>>28985337
The pokemon in the episode weren't supposed to resemble anything. I'm not saying it's not canon, because it totally is. It's a flashback. They were just placeholder pokemon because Eusine didn't know what they were. So take your (you) and fuck off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:31:24 No.28985392 Report

Quoted By: >>28985419 >>28986063

>>28985352
you need to learn how to do time stamps.

At 121 you can see the silhouettes but none of them even look like a pokemon that's been shown to us yet, closest thing that comes to mind is houndour but even that's a stretch, fire type pokemon dying from a fire? Not likely.

But #RipEeveeFags

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:33:04 No.28985417 Report

Quoted By: >>28985460

>>28985366
>M-Muh head canon

>>28985359
I'm beginning to think you don't know what it means.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:33:09 No.28985419 Report

Quoted By: >>28985455 >>28985491 >>28986063

>>28985392
Falling debris can kill too you know. Fire types aren't immune to fire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:33:29 No.28985424 Report

Quoted By:

We clearly saw what happen.
3 weird looking pokémon died, ho-oh revived them and yea...the dogs are alive. Are we really gonna argue about this!?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1473942896818.jpg, 37KiB, 327x722

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:35:13 No.28985455 Report

Quoted By: >>28985480

>>28985419
>charizard falling into lava

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:35:30 No.28985460 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985417
I'm not saying the Eevee theory is true. All I'm saying is that it's not busted by this episode.

GG man.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:36:38 No.28985480 Report

Quoted By: >>28985537 >>28985613

>>28985455
Ashnime isn't canon. : )

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:37:09 No.28985491 Report

Quoted By: >>28985536

>>28985419
>Houndour has Flash fire

But yeah falling Debris is a more likely theory, they clearly didn't have early bird. :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:39:02 No.28985536 Report

Quoted By: >>28985556

>>28985491
Unnerve

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:39:03 No.28985537 Report

Quoted By: >>28985594

>>28985480
>riding on fireturle, on lava, in pokemon ranger

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:40:06 No.28985556 Report

Quoted By: >>28985622

>>28985536
Fuck it's probably a good thing they died then.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:42:12 No.28985594 Report

Quoted By: >>28985678 >>28986793

>>28985537
Pokemon ranger games canon? Nope. The trainer classes have different roles and outfits too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:43:04 No.28985613 Report

Quoted By: >>28985644

>>28985480
A Charmeleon evolves into Charizard after falling into lava in Pokemon Snap

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:43:36 No.28985622 Report

Quoted By: >>28985687 >>28985830 >>28988414

>>28985556
Except they didn't. Also. Houndour are Kanto Pokemon. What would they be doing in Ecruteak?
Oh. It's because they were never there. : )

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:45:03 No.28985644 Report

Quoted By: >>28985690

>>28985613
Snap isn't canon. Charmeleon doesn't evolve by going into lava in the games does he? Nope. Nice try, friend.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:46:00 No.28985665 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985352
>Pokemon were clearly dogs

Cat theorists BTFO

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1475636110952.gif, 1MiB, 200x131

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:46:47 No.28985678 Report

Quoted By: >>28985700 >>28986677

>>28985594
If the anime isn't canon and the games aren't canon
What is then canon, the manga!? The manga also had a pokémon surf on lava.
Pretty sure groudon was swimming in a lava pool on ruby

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:47:20 No.28985687 Report

Quoted By: >>28985728

>>28985622
Houndour are Johto Pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:47:35 No.28985690 Report

Quoted By: >>28985771

>>28985644
did Richard learn to speak English properly or are you just an equal-tier autist?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:48:21 No.28985700 Report

Quoted By: >>28985747 >>28986203

>>28985678
Main series games/Generations episodes

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO oh_shit_nigger_what_are_you_doing2.jpg, 216KiB, 854x480

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:49:28 No.28985716 Report

Quoted By:

>>28984501
>Nameless Pokemon
>"Nuh uh, the silhouettes were CLEARLY Houndoom!"

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO HoundourLocation.png, 4KiB, 379x70

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:50:26 No.28985728 Report

Quoted By: >>28988414

>>28985687

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:50:55 No.28985737 Report

Quoted By: >>28985774

>>28984501
What were those Pokemon? I don't recognize them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:51:27 No.28985747 Report

Quoted By: >>28985796

>>28985700
Explain groudon then?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:52:19 No.28985771 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985690
Who's Richard? Also. Seeing how you've reached so low to call me names. I'll go down to your level.

I know what you are, but what am I? : )

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:52:30 No.28985774 Report

Quoted By: >>28985800

>>28985737
Nameless pokémon, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:54:19 No.28985796 Report

Quoted By: >>28985822

>>28985747
What about Groudon? His ability to go through lava?

"Groudon has appeared in mythology as the creator of the land. It sleeps in magma underground and is said to make volcanoes erupt on awakening."

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:54:37 No.28985800 Report

Quoted By: >>28985818 >>28985871

>>28985774
I gathered that much. If they can't even be named, or shown, why is OP assuming they were not Eeveelutions?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1474161601024.png, 67KiB, 225x204

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:55:29 No.28985818 Report

Quoted By: >>28985837

>>28985800
Because he's an idiot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:55:49 No.28985822 Report

Quoted By: >>28985847 >>28986063

>>28985796
Anon. You know that Pokemon get burned all the time, right? A Will-O-Wisp is enough to burn them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:56:31 No.28985830 Report

Quoted By: >>28985880

>>28985622
Hm good point so what dog-like pokemon was it? Cuz it definitely wasn't any eeveelution unless of course the flashback was so far back normal dogs were still alive.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:56:51 No.28985837 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985818
That literally explains everything. Thanks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:57:04 No.28985842 Report

Quoted By: >>28985878

>>28985366
>>28985366
>>28985366

Yeah, like how when discussing the Super Saiyan prior to release,

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:57:28 No.28985847 Report

Quoted By: >>28986083

>>28985822
What does that have to do with what I just said? Explain to me. What's going on inside that simple mind of yours?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:58:35 No.28985871 Report

Quoted By: >>28985921 >>28985928

>>28985800
Shadowfigures of the nameless pokémon were shown. Are we saying that we're blind now?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:58:51 No.28985878 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985366
>>28985842
>>28985842

Sorry, message got cut off, I meant to say, when discussing the Super Saiyan before it was revealed, they represented it as a Oozaru silhouette, even when the writers knew what it would look like, simply for the sake of showcasing the animation without making it autistic

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 17:58:59 No.28985880 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985830
No one knows. The Pokemon in the flashback were supposed to be vague.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1475458950990.jpg, 30KiB, 350x358

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:01:06 No.28985920 Report

Quoted By:

I love how ridiculous this thread got.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:01:11 No.28985921 Report

Quoted By: >>28985999

>>28985871
The shadowfigures weren't supposed to represent a specific pokemon. Holy fuck. How dense are you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:01:30 No.28985927 Report

Quoted By:

Clearly helmetless Type: Nulls

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:01:30 No.28985928 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985871
So you're considering those Pokemon silhouette actual Pokemon? You're implying that one day, we'll get three Pokemon that can be found in Johto, which all look the same but have different types? They were clearly place holders.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:04:45 No.28985999 Report

Quoted By: >>28986033

>>28985921
>3 nameless dogs
>DOGS
How stupid can you be?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:07:13 No.28986033 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985999
"3 nameless Pokemon perished" - Eusine

Not dogs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:08:26 No.28986063 Report

Quoted By: >>28986083 >>28986122

.>>28985392
>Fire type pokemon dying from a fire? Not likely.

You replied with;
>>28985419
>Fire types aren't immune to fire

Implying that simple Fire is enough to burn any Pokemon to ashes, to which I responded with >>28985822
Giving you proof that Fire-types, who cannot be burned, are pretty much immune to fire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:09:30 No.28986083 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986063
Oh, that post was a reply to >>28985847
Forgot to put that in. My bad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:11:41 No.28986120 Report

Quoted By: >>28986142

Let's not forget that water eevee and fire eevee can escape

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:11:47 No.28986122 Report

Quoted By: >>28986170 >>28986213 >>28986249

>>28986063
Use flamethrower on a Infernape. They can't get burned, but they still take damage from fire moves.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:13:01 No.28986142 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986120
Vaporeon can still get burned. : )

Hard to escape with all the smoke/falling debris.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:15:10 No.28986170 Report

Quoted By: >>28986196

>>28986122
What about Slugma? It's a walking lava pool but it can get damaged by fire

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:16:17 No.28986196 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986170
Lava isn't fire.
NEXT.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:16:27 No.28986203 Report

Quoted By: >>28986240 >>28986250

>>28985700
But pokemon rangers are in the main series games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:17:18 No.28986213 Report

Quoted By: >>28986413

>>28986122
That's because a strong Pokemon is using that move. The Pokemon's Special Attack is making the Fire stronger.
If a weak Pokemon, one with 0 Special Attack stat, was to use Flamethrower, then it would be the same as a normal fire and do no damage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:18:26 No.28986240 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986203
It was in the anime and the main games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:18:53 No.28986249 Report

Quoted By: >>28986305

>>28986122
>They can't get burned
Exactly. You can use Flamethrower all you want, and you still won't be able to burn a Pokemon down to death.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO daaaab.jpg, 15KiB, 480x360

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:18:54 No.28986250 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986203
The trainer classes have different outfits and roles in the main series games.

NEXT

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 54642169.png, 2KiB, 285x27

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:21:28 No.28986305 Report

Quoted By: >>28986413

>>28986249
Except you can. If flamethrower can bring an Infernape to near death, then I'm pretty sure it can kill it.

Next.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:27:33 No.28986413 Report

Quoted By: >>28986448 >>28986531

>>28986305
What about what this anon said >>28986213

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:29:17 No.28986448 Report

Quoted By: >>28986504

>>28986413
This reminds me: how strong was the fire that killed the dogs?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:32:49 No.28986504 Report

Quoted By: >>28986589

>>28986448
A normal fire caused by lightning. They weren't hit by lightning directly. It wasn't that powerful, just widespread.
It was also raining, so that would've made it even weaker.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1465252820199.png, 162KiB, 376x210

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:34:05 No.28986531 Report

Quoted By: >>28986546

>>28986413
Oh look. If I put in a zero for Attack, I still get a positive number!

NEXT

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Damage.png, 5KiB, 541x94

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:35:08 No.28986546 Report

Quoted By: >>28986704

>>28986531
Meant to post this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:37:30 No.28986589 Report

Quoted By: >>28986620 >>28986664

>>28986504
Then, this wouldn't kill any pokémon (unless super duper weak to fire)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:39:30 No.28986620 Report

Quoted By: >>28986664

>>28986589
You do know that rain doesn't do much to calm a fire of that size?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:41:42 No.28986664 Report

Quoted By: >>28986738

>>28986589
A Will-O-Wisp doesn't do damage, but the burn that follows does. If they were to touch it for a microsecond, they wouldn't be hurt, but if they stayed in it and caught on fire, it would.

>>28986620
Tell that Pokemon. Every Fire-Move is weakened in Rain. If it's raining especially hard, there is zero damage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:42:24 No.28986677 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985678
Nothing is canon unless I want it to be.

My headcanon is all that matters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:43:56 No.28986704 Report

Quoted By: >>28986738 >>28987007

>>28986546
The amount of damage that does is equal to getting poked. Nothing will ever die from it.

>But if you keep at it long enough
You would run out of PP. You would literally run out of Fire before you can kill a Pokemon with that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:45:57 No.28986738 Report

Quoted By: >>28987039

>>28986704
>>28986664
Give up. This is a bait thread and the OP is an actual autist. He won't even admit the fact that Fire Pokemon literally can not be burned.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:48:10 No.28986793 Report

Quoted By: >>28987024

>>28985594
They link up with the main series games.

What more do you need for them to be considered canon, you stubborn motherfucker?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 18:59:56 No.28987007 Report

Quoted By: >>28987362

>>28986704
Still, your initial argument that fire doesn't do damage is a joke.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:00:59 No.28987024 Report

Quoted By:

>>28986793
How so? You say this, but you provide no evidence.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:02:02 No.28987039 Report

Quoted By: >>28987362

>>28986738
Right? OP is an idiot. No theory was busted.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:18:25 No.28987362 Report

Quoted By: >>28987412

>>28987039
Yes, no theory is busted unless he shows us which Pokemon burned.

>>28987007
No, it isn't. My initial point was that Fire types cannot be damaged by fire. You changed the subject to Fire-type Moves. Those are different thing.

>No they arent
Explain why?

Take two different Fire-type move, for example. Both Fire Blast and Flamethrower are just fire, released by the same Pokemon, but it deals different amount of damage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:21:00 No.28987412 Report

Quoted By: >>28987440

>>28987362
They release a different amount of fire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:22:36 No.28987440 Report

Quoted By: >>28987490

>>28987412
Then why don't they always?
Do you believe a Fire breathing Dragon needs to be taught how to release fire for a bit longer?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:24:49 No.28987490 Report

Quoted By:

>>28987440
Yeah, that's why they don't learn those high base moves so early. It's why there's a progression from ember to flamethrower to fireblast.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:29:38 No.28987577 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985337
>3 nameless pokemon that were shadowed.
If you think the shadows were supposed to represent the shape of the actual pokemon that died then you are a retard. They just resemble beasts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:34:21 No.28987663 Report

Quoted By: >>28987873

Don't forget that Fire Blast can REPLACE Flamethrower. That means, according to your logic, once a Pokemon learns to shoot more fire, it can forget how to shoot less fire.

Stop trying to drag moves into this. They are a completely separate thing. If they were the same, a Pokemon that can be hurt from Bubble would also be hurt from Rain Dance, because both is just water. Rain Dance would actually do more damage, according to your logic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:35:48 No.28987692 Report

Quoted By:

>>28985366
I think they were just dogs because animals coexist with pokemon, but to not confuse anyone they just went with pokemon or maybe that's the legend

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1474661216093.png, 231KiB, 613x560

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:45:43 No.28987873 Report

Quoted By: >>28988010

>>28987663
This is getting nowhere. I forgot what we're even arguing about.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1475221480337.jpg, 39KiB, 640x501

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:51:33 No.28987976 Report

Quoted By: >>28988010

>This thread
Have you all forgotten that this is all imaginary?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:53:01 No.28988010 Report

Quoted By: >>28988209

>>28987873
The main subject was, you said Pokemon could be hurt with fire, but they can't be burned normally in game. Then you brought something completely different, Pokemon Moves, into this.
Now, the whose argument makes sense depends completely on whether Fire-type Pokemon moves are the same normal fire. We haven't gone off topic, so don't pretend like we have.

>>28987976
Then why are you here? Whatever your reason is, that applies to us too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 19:58:21 No.28988117 Report

Quoted By: >>28988192

The silhouettes (at least the front and center one) have clearly defined outlines (looking NOTHING like the eeveelutions, for good reason).
They do represent specific Pokemon, however: the three Beasts, before they were 'Legendary'.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:02:02 No.28988192 Report

Quoted By: >>28988217 >>28988233

>>28988117
How fucking dense are you. They have a clear outline, but they're not meant to represent anything. No specific Pokemon. It could still be the Eeveelutions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:03:13 No.28988209 Report

Quoted By: >>28988255

>>28988010
Okay. Then let's look at it from your point of view. It's a regular fire. Fire Pokemon can get hurt since it's a regular fire, and not a Pokemon fire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:03:44 No.28988217 Report

Quoted By: >>28988226

>>28988192
Not at all, they could have been really dogs

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:04:23 No.28988226 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988217
Eusine specifically says Pokemon.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1475867109849.png, 578KiB, 1136x640

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:04:48 No.28988233 Report

Quoted By: >>28988259

>>28988192
>not meant to represent anything
>no specific Pokemon

Who are the legendary beasts then? They are not ambiguous if they have a CLEAR outline.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:06:05 No.28988255 Report

Quoted By: >>28988286

>>28988209
No Pokemon has been shown being hurt by fire. Multiple Pokemon have been seen surfing in lava.

>Lava not the same as fire
Yes, it's not the same; it's even hotter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:06:09 No.28988259 Report

Quoted By: >>28988274 >>28988302

>>28988233
The flashback doesn't mean anything. Eusine was telling the story. Eusine doesn't know shit.

Just stop man. You're making yourself look stupid.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _________.jpg, 8KiB, 257x196

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:07:16 No.28988274 Report

Quoted By: >>28988326

>>28988259
>sperging out over headcanon this hard

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:08:01 No.28988286 Report

Quoted By: >>28988361 >>28988368

>>28988255
Give me something from the main games that shows a Pokemon surfing in Lava. And don't say Groudon. His Pokedex entry allows it.

And you're right. No Pokemon has been shown being hurt by a fire. But that's just because there aren't really any fires in the games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:08:54 No.28988302 Report

Quoted By: >>28988349

>>28988259
So you've finally come to terms with the simple fact that no one has anything to argue about?
Or are you playing the superiority game?

The Legendary Beasts are the Legendary Beasts. Before they were dead, they were just beasts. It doesn't matter what they were, in any way.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1474305027906.jpg, 123KiB, 710x545

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:09:59 No.28988326 Report

Quoted By: >>28988357

>>28988274
There is no headcanon. If you watched the video then you'd see.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:11:17 No.28988349 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988302
Thank you. All that matters is that they were Pokemon. They could've been the Eeveelutions. They may not have beem. No one knows. There's nothing to argue about.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:11:53 No.28988357 Report

Quoted By: >>28988423

>>28988326
Direct me to said video where the 'Eeveelution' Theory is now more plausible than the 'They are Fucking Ambiguous Beasts you Sperg it Doesn't Matter' Theory, please.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:12:10 No.28988361 Report

Quoted By: >>28988405

>>28988286
So I assume Pokedex entries count, since you're counting Groudon's.

Magmar.
>Born in an active volcano
>It can heal itself by dipping its wound into lava

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:12:26 No.28988364 Report

Quoted By:

only pokemon GO is canon you retards

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:12:40 No.28988368 Report

Quoted By: >>28988383

>>28988286
Slugma

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:13:34 No.28988383 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988368
Literally made of lava. Don't give me a stupid answer next time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:13:51 No.28988387 Report

Quoted By: >>28988453

>>28984501
>EEVEE THEORISTS
Who? What Eevee theory?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:14:55 No.28988405 Report

Quoted By: >>28988539

>>28988361
His Pokedex entry allows it. Well good. It's acceptable. But not every fire type Pokemon can swim in lava and that's all that matters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:15:17 No.28988414 Report

Quoted By: >>28988444

>>28985622
>>28985728
Eevee also don't occur in Johto though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:16:00 No.28988423 Report

Quoted By: >>28988510

>>28988357
The recent generations episode. The outlines don't mean anything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:17:12 No.28988444 Report

Quoted By: >>28988484

>>28988414
But they're heavily featured in Ecruteak.

Kimono Girls, Anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:17:40 No.28988453 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988387
Well, the theory that the Pokémon who perished in the fire at the Burned Tower and subsequently resurrected by Ho-oh as the Legendary Beasts were a Vaporeon, a Flareon, and a Jolteon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:19:37 No.28988484 Report

Quoted By: >>28988533

>>28988444
But this is in the past we're talking about
And eevee is front kanto

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:21:12 No.28988510 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988423
You're making a cognitive leap that isn't intellectually sound. The aforementioned 'It Doesn't Matter' Theory is automatically more sound because it holds the fact that the shadows are ambiguous (even though to my eye the front shadow looks like Suicune, which makes sense because the ONLY thing the shadows represent are the Beasts). This means the 'It Doesn't Matter' Theory INCLUDES the 'Eeveelution' theory inside of it. Assuming they are Eeveelutions makes a leap that assuming it doesn't matter doesn't leaving not giving a fuck more logically sound.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:22:21 No.28988533 Report

Quoted By: >>28988592

>>28988484
It's actually not from Kanto either. : )

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:22:36 No.28988539 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988405
Eh, I'm all out of arguments, then. I haven't seen Fire in Pokemon, other than the Burn Status, which can only be inflicted a Pokemon move or by touch a Pokemon with Flame Body, which I assume you won't count.

Though Magmar would've helped in proving my previous point, that normal fire is different from Fire-type moves.
Normal Lava heals Magmar, while it can be hurt with Lava Plume.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:25:31 No.28988592 Report

Quoted By: >>28988638

>>28988533
Oh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:28:14 No.28988638 Report

Quoted By: >>28988788

>>28988592
I believe he is referencing that Eevee is only caught in the wild in Unova (Castelia) and Kalos (Route 10). I believe ORAS as well as a Dexnav only Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:36:13 No.28988768 Report

Quoted By:

The best thing about not assuming you know something that you can't possibly know is that you can walk into a thread like this and have a chuckle. True entertainment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Oct 2016 20:37:09 No.28988788 Report

Quoted By:

>>28988638
Well, that's really weird but ok

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches