Why do stubborn leakfags still think the starters are anything but fake? Is GameFreak not capable or smart enough to put false data in the demo to throw off data miners? Surely they've learned from the ORAS demo debacle. They're obviously saving the real evolutions for a big surprise.

Things we know that are unexplained by these "evolutions":

The starters have a secret that they share with Rockruff. This implies TWO FORMS for each starter. Why would there only be one form for each in the data mine?

The grass starter begins as a curious owl and becomes a rich foppish young owl. There is NO CONNECTION to suddenly becoming muh Assassin's Creed fan art. Starter Pokémon aren't always great but they always have a connection that makes sense.

Litten's second form is bipedal and looks like a small wildcat. It also has no fighting look to it. Clearly this is meant to become a larger more feral type tiger, not suddenly and randomly become a bipedal humanoid wrestler.

Popplio's evolution is extremely feminine. This implies there must be TWO FORMS, a male and a female version of the line. We have already seen very convincing (quality equal to the Siren) art of a clown like the final evo for Popplio. The Siren/mermaid MAY BE real but it is very likely the female final evolution and the male version of the line is almost certainly the clown. It fits the circus performer theme and makes the Pokémon more accessible to those who don't want a feminine starter.