>>30702774>animations were bad, sprites looked like ballshow is this not objectively a bad thing? when your game is built around sprites, and the sprites look like shit... you're gonna have a bad time. very much an obvious fault
>only new pokemon *snip*I feel you i didn't fully explain myself, here. As i said- i ran out of room, and had to delete a few extra sentences here and there- and this was one that got edited a bit.
When half your franchise is built around 'catching them all' and using your favorite 'mons from older generations in newer games, and both are impossible... something somewhere went terribly wrong.
>*snip* of fucking course i prefer a game that wasn't aimed at 6 yr olds.apparently saying that i prefer a game not aimed at 6 yr olds isn't valid? I don't even know how to help you here, anon.
>story was shit *snip*again, ran out of room and cut an extra sentence here. I could probably write an essay about why gen V's story sucked fucking balls, but i do not feel like putting that effort in, today.
>no memorable charactersno memorable characters in a game with characterization is a MASSIVE (textbook) FAULT! try to argue it isn't.
>box legends were shitopinion, certainly; but it's how i feel. poorly designed, poorly executed, and fitting no thematic theme other than *hurr durr, i'm white and he's black*
>starters were shit *snip*again an opinion, but they are far and away my least favorite starters, from a design standpoint.
>didn't give a shit about victiniwell- i didn't. i don't know how to explain to you why i didn't care about a mythical pikachu-knock-off that was forced down my throat. there is literally no way to make that point 'valid' except by saying that i didn't care for it.
