>>33383604Its more so of "there are a broader spectrum of fetish and culture verses just black and white, and thus personal judgement based on board culture and board inverse culture is needed"
You can't cart blanche say "I don't like it therefore all forms of it are banned." Likewise you can't say "I like it, so all forms of it are accepted." This isn't the case with obvious things such as Porn and Obvious Fetish on blue boards.
>>33383625Those were Moot days, and Moot is a fag. Also /v/ /b/ [s4s] and /pol/ are kind of their own special things that are beyond simple analysis.
>>33383656Which is a good sign of self control; however just because you have a fetish doesn't mean it should be banned for posting all together. There is a spectrum to these things, and as a poster need to figure out where your interests lay on that spectrum.
If you have a tickling fetish and become a member of the staff; don't outright ban tickling fetish threads/posts (unless they are specifically DA/FA tier shit) but also don't overindulge in ticking fetish stuff and push it wherever you go.
I'm a shitposter, so I shove in Sylveon and/or Macro posting wherever I go, this is why I am not staff here.
However you as a regular user would seem to have self control over your interests, and thus have the power to be a proper staff member. Don't hate yourself for what turns you on, but don't be a glutton either. Don't be a cunt, and don't be a faggot essentially.
