>>34391941>Most of the pokemon in gen 1 pokedex are direct translations from actually animals.Except they're not.
Bulbasaur line? No. It's a mix between a dinosaurs, frogs, and possibly even other creatures.
Charmander line? Sort of, except it's a salamander claws and elements of lizards.
Pidgey line? No specific bird looks like Pidgey.
Spearow line? Nope, even less so than Pidgey. Fearow looks like some cross between a stork and a falcon but it doesn't heavily resemble either of them or any other specific bird.
Both Nidoran lines? Nope. Ambiguous mix between rabbits, porcupines, and dinosaurs.
Clefairy line? Nope. It's an original creature.
Jigglypuff? Nope. It's an original creature.
Diglett line? Nope.
Mankey line? Nope.
Growlithe line? Mix between tigers and dogs.
Abra line? Nope.
Machop line? Nope.
Geodude line? Nope.
Slowpoke line? Definitely nope.
Hypno? Mix between tapirs and primates.
Cubone line? Nope.
Hitmons? Nope.
Lickitung? Very vaguely has similarities with a chameleon. But mostly nope.
Gastly line? Nope. It's an original creature.
Koffing line? Nope. It's an original creature.
Rhyhorn? Mix between a rhino and a dinosaur.
Chansey? Original design.
Kangaskhan? Nope. It looks more like a dinosaur than a kangaroo even though it is still clearly inspired by kangaroos.
Scyther? Nope.
Electabuzz? Original design that has vague ogre elements.
Magmar? Original design that has vague bird elements.
Eevee line? Nope.
Kabutops? Has elements of a horseshoe crab but design is still mostly original.
Snorlax? Nope.
Mewtwo? Nope.
Compare gen 7.The only designs you can't just dumb down to cartoon animals are the Tapu, Comfey, and some of the UBs. That's it.
>and saying that negates the fact that Scyther is a Pray-Mantis. But it's not a cartoon praying mantis. It's very clearly also inspired by dinosaurs. It's not just its feet. Its entire head design and lack of six limbs are dinosaur-like.
>>34391952I'm glad you're learning something underagefag.
