>>34632915>You have been told how an average fighting pokemon looks: Based on motor activities or martial arts.You have been told that that is BS. Meloetta is a singer, the Musketeers are just mutant horse things, Poliwrath just has Mario's gloves, etc.
If the Musketeers are legit Fighting types because most of them have horns then why isn't my Sphinx a legit fighting type?
>You need just a re color here, that blue doesn't works with those wings.Since when do blue and grey not work together? It's a classic complementary color combination.
>>34632931>They are fighting type because their musketeers. Musketeers are usually fencers which is ironically a fighting style.But they're not actually Masketeers, dingus. That's their loose design inspiration but it doesn't actually carry over in design. Virizion doesn't even have horns or anything.
>Pirouette form is fighting because dancing is a cardiovascular exercise that strengthens muscles. Also it could be interpreted as a reference to dancers which are a warrior/physical class in RPG video games.You have to realize how fucking flimsy that is. If GF made a pokemon based on stretching in the morning and called it a Fighting type would you just say "Yup, makes perfect sense"?
>Based primarily on American football players. Look at they do and try to tell me that it doesn't deserve the fighting type.It doesn't deserve the Fighting type. Physical activity=/=fighting. So say otherwise is just nonsense. When you have a hard time opening a jar do you say you got into a fight?
>It's a UB. they have a totally standard when it comes to typing. That's such an asspull.
>My question is, why do you think it looks like a fighting type?I don't think a Fighting type has to look like a specific thing, and neither does GameFREAK.
>>34632942>I've given you some decent criticism for your fakemon>AnonymousHow the fuck would I know?
>It's a bad design, no one but you likes it.Multiple people here have said they like it, you liar
