>>34652600His retarded food analogy is faulty by default as taste itself is subjective. So I can't deal with food that's too spicy, does this means that a cook that serves me with such food is shit?
Of course not. So he's basically shooting himself in the foot with such analogy as it shows how limited and disposable his "critique" is, summing it into "I like" or "I dislike".
>b-but recipes! Poor technique! Those are objective measures!Transfering this to art and concepts such as composition, anatomy, light and shadow and color, none of the artists posted here fail.
So their art is objectively good. If you like it or not is another thing, but don't vomit your opinions as if they were fact, let alone think that you're even close to be able to offer criticism.
