>>34944216>Not every image/drawing has to be anatomically correct,They're reference sheets. So they actually do need to be anatomically correct. I don't think you understand the point of reference sheets. You can deviate FROM the reference sheet when doing the actual animation, but the reference sheet itself needs to be accurate.
>>34944225Nothing about it is nitpicking. It's just bad art. The official reference sheets are far more professional and clear than the shit in the OP. I actually find it pretty unfortunate that people here are so artistically brain dead that they think this is on par with official drawings.
>>34944231>>>>>>little inconsistenciesThe hair is completely fucking wrong anon
The arm is completely fucking wrong anon
These aren't "little" inconsistencies, they're a shitty amateur artist who didn't double check his work.
>>34944235>The hair goes back-outward at the bottomThis doesn't explain why the hair is drawn in two completely different positions.
And no, it's not concept art. Concept art is rougher than this. This is clearly meant to be reference art like the starter leaks from 2 years ago.
>>34944242>baitingNothing about it bait. Are you going to provide a counterargument or are you just going to drone on about things you can't argue against being "bait" or "nitpicks?"
