>>35607046>multiple leakers confirming this is true (how many times has this happened for other leaks?)They're only leakers if they're later confirmed to be correct. That obviously has not happened so there's no evidence there.
>domains registered by the same guys who registered sun and moon's websiteRegistered AFTER the supposed leak and only registered through the same service. We have no idea of they were registered by the same people, but even if they were they could have acquired those domains simply to reroute people looking for widely reported fake games to the actual games. Other developers have done that in the past.
>the same leak that confirmed the nintendo online reveal date stated that the mainline Pokemon game would return to Kanto and release in 2018This is another things that has yet to be proven and is thus not evidence of anything.
>Project Eevee account on twitterEevee is in the new movie and is probably only second to Pikachu in terms of popularity. That's not proof of anything beyond Eevee being popular.
>Broken Leg eevee probably evolves into flying-type/dragon in the new Pokemon movieWhich is evidence of new games, not remakes.
And you know what else is evidence of new games and not remakes? The fake that the guy who runs the Pokemon Company said they were making new games and not remakes.
