>>35636209Admittedly I do kind of like it when it's depicted like that.
I'm also a sucker for realistic Pokemon art work though.>>35635957Well sure non of them are threatening in terms of ingame difficulty or anything like that. I'm more so trying to fit them into a somewhat believable scenario/encounter.
>>35636608I reviewed it and made a couple of edits. That's the best I can do, Tim.
>>35636184>I felt Gen 4 was the weakest overall. Was a massive letdown after Hoenn(outside of the starters).Gen 4 is pretty lackluster in terms of it's new Pokemon, but I really like some of the new evolutions that got added. I also hate a lot of them though, shit like Rhyperior, Lickilicky and Tangrowth are fucking disgusting abominations, but then we have great evo's like Mismagius, Yanmega, Honchcrow and Magnezone (although if I'm honest I still prefer Magneton but Magnezone definitely isn't bad).
Gen 1 and 6 without a doubt have the best ratio of good to bad designs though, I will never change my mind about that. Regardless of how you feel about X&Y as a whole the dex despite being small was filled to the brim with really good designs. There's like 2-3 bad designs out of the bunch.
>>35636069Are Tentacruel and Ferrothorn mutually exclusive? The fuck?
>>35636049Nope, we still get good non cartoony designs like Dragalge and Vikavolt even now.
