>>35865080>>35865115I'm not trying to prove they are allowed here. I want to prove they have no necessity to be banned.
My point is the anthro. rule makes no sense and is too vague. It doesn't detail on what is "furry", and instead, by its logic, it determines this entire board to be an extreme offense to the rules, and thinks the franchise itself should be forbidden too.
There wasn't even anything sexual to denote in any of deleted images, and meanwhile, Pokégirl threads presents most of suggestive and obscene images, that in most of times, they aren't deleted.
>>35865077It IS fine. It only was deleted just like the others because of the faulty furry rule.
>>35865095I sometimes have the same habit of yours, so I can understand it perfectly, and it's okay.
