>>37617541I disagree with this post aost entirely just because the whole point of Pokemon is variety and it just so happens that humans as a species more likely prefer designs and THINGS in general that they can relate to or are used to.
Bipeds are always going to be popular. Dragons are always going to be popular. Reptiles. Dogs. Foxes etc moreso than an or, a gear or any other inanimate object because they've never actually been living things or """badass""" beforehand.
So obviously the most liked Pokemon are going to be bipeds and obviously more of the furries are going to be within that same pool of people. What the fuck do you expect to happen?
They're not mutually exclusive being popular and being fyrbait. And just because you aren't in the group of people who just like a certain aesthetic doesn't really make you special, just as it doesn't make your basic objectmon exclusive from being turned into porn by a degenerate in your pool of people. Due to relativity, both pools of people contain a ratio of furries. But due to exponential factors like supply and demand, more porn of the other group of Pokemon exists.
So I guess what I'm saying is shut the fuck up nobody cares.
