>>38230319>objectively wrong opinionBy definition it is, that's what I was point out my gay brother.
I don't associate with large amorphous groups like the LGBT For this reason. Too many hypocritical conflicting ideals.
When they added the T to the LGB, it developed into a nonsensical paradox.
The problem wasn't just that being a transsexual has nothing to do with love or sexualality, but that the LG hates the T, and vice versa. It's a fucking mess. And now because of the LGBT 's amorphous nature, it's hard to tell who's officially under its wing. Some say Queers, Some say Pedophiles, Some say it's just T now.
If
>>>/lgbt/ wasn't so shit I could possibly get a more clear answer, because you do not want a nametag when questioning them. And that to, is part of the problem. You can't question it without a quickly falling apart Lynch mob being called forth. That, is bigotry.
