>>39916251“dextrannies” are screeching about the lack of transparency and GF’s obvious lies
No they're the ones screeching endlessly over boxfillers as if they actually care about them
>THEY (GAYFREAK) stated in an interview that “older pokemon models would not be able to be transferred to the newer hardware - one of the main reasons being incompatibility. as a result, models had to be remade” They didn't say all the models were, it's unclear how many were remodeled (like Rhyperior and Weavile were)
>they tell the fans that as a result, some ‘mons were to be excluded because of said setbacks. Did you miss the part where GF said they were thinking about doing this back in gen 7. This moment was just when GF realize it's time to stop appealing to the autism of dextrannies because they essentially want infinite mons and will NEVER be satifised with what they have. You can give them five thousand mon, but they won't thank you for them. Rather just demand for five thousand one hundred mons afterwards. There's no end to the madness of Dextrannies.
>fans began to take note of how a lot of the ‘mons literally were replicas of their supposed future-proof models. Some of them were transferred, but even that takes a lot despite being future proof as future proof does not mean it's a click of a button
>The same models that were apparently incompatible with the new platform. No they said that some models don't look good from the transfer from 3ds to switch which makes the process even harder
>This began to raise a lot of questions from the fan base.Most Pokefans are retarded armchair developers that get their info off YouTube. Any expert would tell you that 800 mons is a ridiculous amount for any franchise
>They justify their reason for REMOVAL with self imposed limitations. No it's because it's impossible to keep up the requests of dextrannies in the long run.
>quality content.Boxfillers arent quality content. Especially when there is over 800 of them
