>>40409070>Not really. Unova has more Pokemon in the dex than Kanto does. Is Unova an issue now?Having more pokémon in the dex of own game isn't an issue, the issue is giving a lot of space, importance to ONE gen in a future game with giving new forms, merchs and attention.
>But you can still catch other Pokemon to use competitively instead.Too bad the pool is reduced because now they decided to cut the dex, and give more space to kantomons.
>But there is fresh air.In the last trailer they showed ONLY kantomons which gets new forms. So no, there is no fresh air.
>Yes but the out of lore reason they exist is the appeal of seeing updates to old Pokemon.Thanks for proving my point.
>So is the starter you're given.1 out of 3, its not the same of only one. You don't have 1 starter, you can choose 1 starter from 3, it's different, but of course you're kantofag and you don't know those differences since you say "it's okay if they put a lot of kanto".
>So pandering is fine as long as it makes sense?Yes. Indeed that's why i'm saying it doesn't make sense in-lore (and even in-merch) some pandering, instead of using pokémon which could make a lot of more sense in the context. It makes more sense to give mega-forms to the game released rather then kanto, don't you think?
>Yes, because it's the mascot.So it's ok focusing a lot on it, yeah sure.
>And the form makes it specifically not a Kanto Pokemon anymore so it doesn't matter.Yes it does matter, stop saying "no" because it doesn't make sense your statement. They're still from the first gen, they take from them and give a new form, even the dex number is the same, so what's your point?
>But they do focus on the other Pokemon so your argument makes no sense.If there wasn't kanto-pandering, a lot of more pokémon could get attention.
>And?You know.
