>>40919837> nobody cared about the pokemon count until sw/shthat's because ever since the beginning of pokemon, you were always able to have all of the pokemon on any main pokemon game you wanted.
> pokemon don't matter when there's a lot.pokemon DO matter. why would we have a pokemon game without pokemon? we can even see the fanbase split in half due to the dex cut. how can you just ignore this and act like nothing is wrong?
> we don't have 400 wild areasthat's because there was never a demand for wild area. however, it is expected of each pokemon game to allow pokemon transfer because it's been that way for twenty years.
> play gen 7 again.i did.
looks the exact fucking same.
your point?
> reasons are...CONTENT: they have yet to display any content that is lagre enough to deserve the dex cut.
gameplay features: what new features are you talkng about? upscaling a model and calling it a day? cooking mama curry edition? these don't justify a dex cut.
ANIMATIONS/GRAPHICS: as stated before, the animations are the exact same as usum: terrible. the graphics are sub par. nothing about this game looks completed in a graphical sense. this is not only not worth the dex cut, but is also an outright fabrication by gamefreak!
no matter what you through out, nothing can justify the cut pokedex. the pokedex should be top priority, and yet gamefreeak's top priority is how to scam you. they've succeeded.
> gymsit's referring to a rumor that there were 18 gyms in galar, but only 9 were accessible. the "in lore" meme represents masuda's terrible excuses for not pushing a superior product.
> powercreep> 700 bstthe only megas to pierce 700 bst were already legendaries and pseudo legendaries. you are incorrect. therefore, mega evolution is necessary and proper.
> weak mons are supposed to be weakthat's not how pokemon works. weak pokemon are weak because some fail to meet the new standards of the meta that they're introduced to. when megas rolled around, peop-
