>>42211476>So you are saying since the game looks like garbage thats proof that the console is too weak to have all the monsters in it ?Has little to do with the "console". Has a lot to do with Gamefreak using a new engine and trying to get everything they had created before to work on it. Which they can't do in 1 year let alone 3.
>(even if dragon quest have 700+ monsters)Yeah and how many of those monsters evolve? Have IVs, natures, and abilities to boot on top of their 10 skills?
Yeah 700+ monsters means shit if they all just meant to look like ass and open their mouth here and there.
>Nobody expected the games to be exceptionalYeah nice try on that one.
>you cant deny the game looks the same as the 3ds onesThat's the entire point they want that anime-ish transition more than they want a more polished or realistic looking pokemon ala Detective Pikachu movie.
>the devs themselves admitted to using the same engine as the one for lets go who was un upscaled version of the ones from 3ds.Let's go had less pokemon than swsh and doesn't even look graphically identical to SwSh.
>I mean the games struggled to hit 20 fps on 3ds and now it struggles to hit 30 fps on switchThat's not how frames work but hey you seem to be a master of fps.
>your telling me its the console that is the problemslike how you keep jumping to this conclusion
>not the developpers behind the game who clearly showed they cant do crap with little town hero. especially when you have so many games on the same console to compare.If you understand that gamefreak is ass why do you expect them to be on the same competent level of Bandai Namco Studios?
A game appearing on another system does not make it better. It requires work.
>Shut the fuck up, even if people had unrealistic expectation They did.
>you cant shun them for starting to see the flaws of the gamesI can cause they were being unrealistic with their expectations and demands.
>that doesnt invalidate their complains.It does.
