>>43264949>If it weren't readily identifiable like that it we would just call it a glitch and not have a name for it.I'm willing to amend my point to say that Missingno does have SOME attributes which could make it identifiable, as opposed to none at all... but I still say that those attributes are just so vague that it has an extremely wide variety of forms, and therefore people can draw nearly anything and it could still be reasonably considered a "Missingno".
Pic related: these are all "Missingno", because they're birds colored peach and purple. But they also don't look much at all like one another. This is what I was getting at: there is such a wide variety of forms... but which one is "more accurate" or "resembles Missingno the most"? It may have SOME design concepts that makes it "Missingno", but not enough that any single design could ever be considered its most authentic form... aside from a random splotch of purple amd peach pixels.
