>>43804014>No, because these aren't smear frames.I keep telling you, I never said they were.
>They don't depict quick movement, it's just the Pokemon slowly moving normally, which is why it looks like complete shit.So it looks like shit because it's slow? I guess some frames might be like that, but the majority of them don't even look that bad. So there might be a weird frame or two in there, but since it's moving you barely see them. Even looking at the image in
>>43803469, the only really bad ones are zubat, totodile, doduo, mew, and maybe shiftry. The others are just pixelated because they've been blown up, and have been blown up at different scales too. And these are single frames of many-framed animations.
I still think the analogy is fair enough, because you can't look at a single frame of an animation to judge the entire thing. That just doesn't make sense.
